A little Ralph Miliband blogging

I’ve recently started reading Ralph Miliband’s Socialism in a Sceptical Age. Partly because someone on twitter wants to quote Ralph every time Ed says something, here are a couple of points so far.

RM felt that the power of Big Media was akin to the power to raise a private army, and he says this with reference to feudalism. Feudalism couldn’t end while the state relied on the barons for mobilisation, and while they controlled mobilisation, they would make sure it didn’t. He may mean that private power over media is to the capitalism of the 1990s (when he was writing) as private power over mobilisation was to feudalism.

RM argues that it’s primarily about power. He doesn’t really take a view about planning vs markets, or if he does I’ve not reached it yet. Whether economic life is dominated by organisations or markets or something else is a secondary point. What matters are the terms of trade between the actors in it. He was very well aware of the criticisms of planned economies and also of Attlee/Nehru nationalised industries. The rigged market is as much an instrument of violence as Gosplan.

Different forms of capitalism are as important as different forms of socialism. It’s still capitalism, but one form may very well be preferable to another.

That said, the difference between a social reformer and a socialist is that one of them wants a society that is egalitarian, democratic, and in which much more of economic life is socialised, which isn’t the same thing as nationalised. The horizon for this may be very long, and in some ways socialism is a way of seeing.

Something else. It’s interesting to run into references to people I otherwise only know as blogs howling at each other about Iraq, like the late Norman Geras, as if they were great intellectual eminences. For example, I made a fool of myself on Crooked Timber not so long ago by demanding to know if there was any reason to care about anything Michael Walzer had ever said. I stand by that one.

4 Comments on "A little Ralph Miliband blogging"

  1. Waitaminit… just noticed the “Authenticate this comment using OpenID” checkbox. I uncheck, I think.

    Now, have at you:

    “The distortions and elisions in Walzer’s arguments are striking, and sometimes strikingly obvious” – me on Walzer, May 2005


  2. OK, it’s a Javascript error. “Authenticate using OpenID” (the setting) is On by default, and when it’s on my comments get rejected. (Which is odd in itself – I’m specifying a WordPress.com blog as my Website & the registered email as my Email, you’d think that would be enough.) I can comment if I set it Off; however, “Authenticate using OpenID” (the check box) only appears if Javascript is disabled. So if Javascript is enabled, comments get rejected.

    There’s definitely something weird about Javascript in this iteration of Firefox (apart from having to go to about:config to disable/enable it) – I was on a site the other day which threw “Enable Javascript” errors if it was off, but wouldn’t let me log in if it was on.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.